Have you had problems with the Skype extension? If so, share in the comments.Īndroid application chrome conference email error extension fast featured file Firefox Google greasemonkey guide install installation internet explorer iphone Java JavaScript Linux mobile MySQL new Performance Perl phone plugin problem screen script search server solution sun suse SVN tip twitter update video windows Wordpress xml youtube need to perform burn-in tests for your CPU or RAM.this extension is notorious for its crashes, bugs, and memory leaks.this is the worst memory leak in a Firefox extension I've ever seen.somebody at Skype doesn't know how to program.So where am I going with all this? Here is the summary: But if you turn number highlighting off but leave name highlighting on – major fail. If you turn name highlighting off – it's fine. If you turn number highlighting on – it's fine. And here's the kicker – it only exposes the memory leak in the following configuration: Sure enough, after about half an hour of starting Firefox, observing the memory leak, killing, and restarting it, I narrowed it down to the Skype extension. Finally, at 5GB total system memory consumption, either the OS kicks in or some major swapping starts to occur – I'm not sure which of the two is happening exactly but you can see it when the green CPU marker gets overtaken by the red one.Īs I have a large number of extensions installed, I was dreading the next step: disabling them until the culprit was found. In the screenshot above, the CPU usage spikes to 100% (shown as 50% because it's a dual core CPU), Firefox's memory usage jumps to around 2GB from 100MB, in 500MB/s increments. This is what we call a memory leak – a prime example at that. What the fudgemonkeys? Let's do this again and watch the Process Explorer. What was a surprise, however, is that when I clicked over to the View API reference page (in case that page ever changes for documentation reasons, I also saved it here), my Firefox went into a painful agony and exploded in a few minutes. Thus, it was no surprise that yesterday I was happily reading the page about Handling UI Events. Those are great, aren't they? However, what really prompted me to write this post is my own experience with this extension.Īs I am getting into Android development nowadays, I read the Android dev guide quite a lot. So what makes me say these mean things? Is it the fact that when simply searching Google for "skype firefox", one finds mostly blog posts and references to major fail? Or is it the fact that MozillaZine's Problematic Extensions page lists Skype as one of the buggiest? The premise is great but the execution… When it comes to your Firefox extension, Skype – you suck. Skype also has a Firefox extension which finds all pieces of text that resemble phone numbers on web pages you are visiting and converts them into clickable Skype buttons. You have the convenience of a nearby, well, convenience store and the UI that is acceptable to even an Apple fanboy (I'm not one, I'm just saying). Microsoft hasn't been real keen on promoting WebRTC, though it did say earlier this week that it was looking to improve the level of WebRTC compatibility in Edge for basic one-to-one audio and video communications.Īs for the plug-in free experience through Edge, you can preview the functionality right now with the latest version of Edge in Windows 10 version 1511.You are great. What about Chrome and Firefox? Both browsers support the older (but similar) WebRTC API. ORTC enables a wide variety of features that Skype uses, everything from simple conversation to scalable multiparty video conferences. The plugin free experience that's emerged is powered by the Object RTC (ORTC) media engine, an API that Microsoft recently embedded in Edge. It was back in October of 2014 that Microsoft said its aim was to "make browser-based calls more convenient by removing the need to download a plugin," and so it began collaborating with W3C (World Wide Web Consortium) and IETF (Internet Engineering Task Force) to improve standards towards that goal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |